<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clippers Let Mike Taylor Go! (&amp; salary cap explanations)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fullyclips.com/2009/07/31/clippers-let-mike-taylor-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fullyclips.com/2009/07/31/clippers-let-mike-taylor-go/</link>
	<description>A LA Clippers Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Short White Boy</title>
		<link>http://fullyclips.com/2009/07/31/clippers-let-mike-taylor-go/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Short White Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fullyclips.com/?p=153#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Will, I agree that not only is Sessions a huge upgrade, but that at this point even Telfair would be too.  However, I felt Taylor showed potential for down the road &amp; that it was very short-sighted to get rid of him.  He scored like 36 points against the Knicks.  Granted my mom plays better D than the Knicks, but still you have to have SOME talent to do that.  If team after team keep giving stiffs like Darko &amp; Kwame second chances, why not Taylor when he could be bought for less than any player except for a total newbie?  If he didn&#039;t improve by the end of the year, then you toss him.  But if he lives up to that potential, he&#039;d be better than Telfair and possibly even better than Sessions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, I agree that not only is Sessions a huge upgrade, but that at this point even Telfair would be too.  However, I felt Taylor showed potential for down the road &#038; that it was very short-sighted to get rid of him.  He scored like 36 points against the Knicks.  Granted my mom plays better D than the Knicks, but still you have to have SOME talent to do that.  If team after team keep giving stiffs like Darko &#038; Kwame second chances, why not Taylor when he could be bought for less than any player except for a total newbie?  If he didn&#8217;t improve by the end of the year, then you toss him.  But if he lives up to that potential, he&#8217;d be better than Telfair and possibly even better than Sessions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://fullyclips.com/2009/07/31/clippers-let-mike-taylor-go/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fullyclips.com/?p=153#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Taylor was cut because his work ethic is not good and because he looked lost in summer league. Turnover turnover turnover. If Baron goes down, he looked completely incapable of starting. Sessions would be a huge upgrade. As it stands Telfair, 23, is an upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor was cut because his work ethic is not good and because he looked lost in summer league. Turnover turnover turnover. If Baron goes down, he looked completely incapable of starting. Sessions would be a huge upgrade. As it stands Telfair, 23, is an upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
